_Task:
2B: Write a reflective statement on your development as a social networker as a result of studying INF506, and the implications for your development as an information professional.

_I enrolled in INF506 because I enjoy social networking. It has been a big part of my social life for a number of years since I moved to China. At the time, I believed that I was quite experienced with social media, so I was skeptical about what would be learned. In November, 2011, I participated in the Library 2.011 Worldwide Virtual Conference, and it was because of this conference that I truly began to appreciate the value of social networking for lifelong learning. I re-immersed myself in social media, but this time wearing additional hats. I was already online as myself for social reasons, but I now had a presence as a teacher, librarian, student, and traveler. At the Learning 2.011 conference I learned that there is great value to being yourself both in real and virtual worlds (Stephens, 2011).

This experience, combined with initial INF506 discussions, has persuaded me to become vigilant about using social media responsibly, particularly as a representative of the information industry. I have encountered an overwhelming amount of learning opportunities. In efforts to stay productively connected, but maintain balance (Utecht, 2008) in my life, I follow in the experience of Novak (2011), knowing that not every single Tweet or post must be read, but that I can pick and choose my experiences.

Participating in INF506 has also helped me to better understand the theories and purposes (and power) of social media. As I stated in my first blog post, I “worked with students on blogs since about 2005 when I started using blogmeister.com with third graders” (Taylor-Weber, 2011, November 23). However, I didn’t have a full understanding of the theory behind the technology. “Using technology without purpose is like painting a wall without actually choosing the colour you are going to use. Your wall may have a shiny new finish, but it might not work effectively with anything else in your house” (Keenan, 2011). I have now experienced the power of social learning, and that sharing and contributing productively is one of the essential skills for 21st-century learners (American Association of School Librarians, 2007). Web 2.0 tools facilitate this shifting of instructional practices by providing the technology necessary to implement the 4C’s of communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity (Wagner, 2011).

The creation of my social media project was a valuable learning experience. While I have worked with a variety of social media tools before, this experience gave me a chance to examine their functions, and how technology brings people together. For example, some tools allow users to share their creations and/or ideas and solicit feedback (e.g. bookmark, image, and video sharing sites, or blogs). Some allow users to connect to each other and form a community around a common interest (e.g. social networks). Others allow content to be collaboratively created (e.g. Google Docs, wikis). Different tools have different social purposes (Uden & Eardley, 2010, pp. 578-580), and are changing rapidly, so whatever the educational needs are, there is likely to be a solution. However, we may be approaching a point where it is common to explore new media without knowing exactly what the educational purpose is. Some project designs focus on this explorational process (Wysocki, 2009), and allow for the flexibility that is often needed in technological environments.

Creating my PLN, however, has had the greatest impact on my social networking skills as an information professional. By connecting to other professionals in and around the information industry, I have discovered a world of expertise. Learning has never been more inspiring. In my first blog post, I indicated what I expected to learn in this subject: “I’m amazed at all the learning potential that can come from social networks and other free educational sources, and I would love to become a leader to help guide others down their personal learning paths” (Taylor-Weber, 2011, November 23). I have come to realize that as TLs, guiding others down their personal learning paths is exactly what we, or all teachers should be doing. This is how teaching should be. Supporting others by helping them pursue their questions and connect to like-minded communities, helping them to get their content from the best sources though experts in the field (Kamenetz, 2010)—this can inspire lifelong learning passions. Such learning experiences are extremely rewarding, and is exactly what all learners should be given the opportunity to have.

References
Back to 2A: Evaluative Statement
 
Througout the INF506 subject, there were various opportunities to explore the capabilities of Second Life (SL). Personally, I have been aware of SL’s existence for many years but never engaged in it because a) I wasn’t sure what benefits it had to offer, and b) I didn’t have the time to commit to a second life when there didn’t seem to be enough time in my first life. My first was an orientation to SL with xxx, where I was shown how to manage the basics. My second was as a presenter for sharing my work from INF506’s first assignment.

I believe Second Life is about communities. It is a useful tool for bringing people together, much like Facebook or Myspace. The difference, however, is that rather than interacting through text, SL users interact virtually through avatar behavior, chat and voice conversation. It is a significantly more engaging experience. Using SL made it fun to participate in a group event because I could see what other people were doing. Giving a presentation was a familiar experience compared to something like Blackboard Collaborate, because in SL you can see your audience. I could see libraries using SL as a forum for meetings, such as for planning or professional development. It is particularly conducive to hosting a large audience, as other programs like Google Talk and Skype are limited in audience size. Further, SL is conducive to projects involving floorplans, layouts, and simulations because of the virtual experiences possible.

I have found SL to be a fun, but challenging learning tool. Today, I am aware of the benefits SL has to offer, and am eager to explore the different islands and groups. However, I believe that my participation will have to wait until I have available time to commit to it. SL is not a tool that fits into your existing life. The learning curve is high, where users must commit time to manipulating settings, troubleshooting, and getting oriented. While it is accomplishable, there is far too much technical detail to attend to in order to have a meaningful SL experience. I believe this will prevent many users from participating in SL, and will therefore make it a difficult tool to use for library services because there are easier (though less interesting) tools available.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/careyque/6759649601
 
__I have used social networking (SN) tools like Twitter, Facebook, Plurk, Ning, etc. for many years. My involvement with these tools has been predominantly social. Today, I place more emphasis on personal learning, but find that I still like to maintain a social presence on these tools. I use SN tools for personal and professional relationships, and conduct myself in a way that is still social with professionals, to some degree. I think it’s important to maintain that human touch, as we each have our own personalities and interests to bring to the network. Plus, I believe that online connections can easily develop into personal relationships.

Over the years, I have gone through Utecht’s Personal Learning Network (PLN) stages and back again. When I first discovered SN, I would have likely gone from level 1 (Immersion) to 5 (Balance). However, since I’ve had children (with a major reduction in free time), I moved to stage 4 (Perspective). In fact, I stepped away from SN (for professional purposes) simply because with a full-time job and a child at home, there was no time for anything else. As a result, I felt disconnected, and professionally isolated. There was professional development through work, but being so busy without sufficient time to think and reflect, it was difficult to apply what I was taught.

When I had my second child, I left work to pursue my Master’s. I also reconnected and rebuilt my PLN. In the time that I had been away from SN, the technologies have grown and improved to more effectively support the development of PLNs. As a result, I have revisited stage 1 (Immersion), lost a lot of sleep during stage 3 (Know it all), and am now feeling comfortable at stage 5 (Balance). While I feel I have balance in the use of my PLN, I continue to explore new tools that could impact my PLN, and therefore, continuously revisit stage 1 (Immersion).

I'd like to become more of a contributor to my PLN. I am continuously learning from others, and while I do share, I still haven’t developed a much of a following. I am quite satisfied with my level of involvement with SN tools. However, returning to work will present new challenges, as I will again need to retreat to stage 4 (Perspective) in order fit SN time for personal learning into my life.

Reference:
Utecht, J. (2008, 3 April). Stages of PLN Adoption. http://www.thethinkingstick.com/stages-of-pln-adoption.
Picture
A map of my PLN
 
What advice from this article will help a PK-grade 12 international school library in China embrace a Library 2.0 ethos? All of the A to Z tips are relevant, but these five (and more) play a very important role in this transition.

D-Direction: When addressing virtual access and social networking for libraries, there are many areas to cover (e.g. improved website, new ILS, social media policy). Formal plans need to be established in order to determine a vision and direction for how this library will change. Which changes to the library will be tackled first?

A-active: It is necessary to remain active and perseverant when incorporating social networking into this library’s practice. In this particular case, remaining active means actively persuing how to use social media in the library when many of the main sites are blocked in China. The library will need to get creative and carefully examine the current users and their social networking habits in order to utilize social networks effectively with these students. Just jumping into Facebook or Twitter usage might not work in this case.

C-Content: However this library decides to move forward with its online presence, the content within the website must be valuable. This also incorporates tips such as B-Blogging, or R-Reference, as all should become a part of the library’s website content.

G-Good Reads or L-Library Thing: Treating these two websites equally, either would be very useful in terms of getting the users involved in the reading community. The problem is that both of these sites have had access issues in China.

K-Koha: The library has been looking into changing the catalog for a long time, but budget has been an issue. Large commercial systems take a huge part of the budget. Maybe the solution is something open source such as Koha? Some investigation needs to be put into this, which also emphasizes the significance of the H-help element. A great amount of support would be needed from the IT department as well as school administration.

Based on:
Brown, A., (2010, Jan. 22) A to Z of Social Networking for Libraries [blog entry]. Retrieved from http://socialnetworkinglibrarian.com/2010/01/22/a-to-z-of-social-networking-for-libraries/

__